Pub !

lepetitzinc.com

we recently said

Photos

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from channel. Make your own badge here.

what?

quickly said

  • Flux RSS des articles

Jeudi 23 février 2006
Ni vu ni connu j't'embrouille : du pur Totony Blair. Et ça fait peur. Pas content de nous prendre en photo en permanence, d'enregistrer les déplacements de nos voitures, de se créer une monumentale collection d'ADN, il lui en faut toujours plus (voir entre autres ici ici ici ou ). Alors il essaye de faire passer devant le parlement un projet de loi, qui permet de ... se passer du parlement !

It will become possible for the government, by ministerial order, without a debate in parliament, to create new criminal offences, punishable with less than two years imprisonment. It could also, according to Cambridge law professor John Spencer (who is not alone in his analysis), introduce house-arrest, give the police stronger powers of arrest and interrogation, set up new courts, and in effect re-write the rules on immigration, nationality, divorce, inheritance and the appointment of judges. Yes, there are safeguards written into the bill supposedly to prevent this sort of dictatorial behaviour, but my experience of safeguards is that they look better on the page than they perform in practice.

A lire dans le Guardian, le Times ou chez NoseMonkey.

A mettre en Parallèle avec :

ARTICLE 1. In addition to the procedure for the passage of legislation outlined in the Constitution, the [beep country] Cabinet is also authorized to enact Laws. . . .

ARTICLE 2. The national laws enacted by the [beep country] Cabinet may deviate from the Constitution provided they do not affect the position of the [beep upper parliament] and the [beep lower parliament].The powers of the [beep head of state] remain unaffected.

ARTICLE 3. The national laws enacted by the [beep country] Cabinet shall be prepared by the [beep head of government] and published in the official gazette. They come into effect, unless otherwise specified, upon the day following their publication . . .

ARTICLE 4. Treaties of the [beep country] with foreign states which concern matters of domestic legislation do not require the consent of the bodies participating in legislation. The [beep country] Cabinet is empowered to issue the necessary provisions for the implementing of these treaties.

 
Alors c'est qui [beep] ? indice : non non ce n'est pas le Royaume-Uni...
Par Nico - Publié dans : channel
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 6 commentaires - Recommander
Retour à l'accueil
bloguer depuis son mobile sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus